*1 DENY; and Opinion Filed May 2, 2017.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00444-CV IN RE TERRENCE MARK GORE, Relator Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF12-12707-U MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Whitehill, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Fillmore Before the Court is relator’s April 28, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which he complains of the trial court’s order granting real party in interest’s motion to expunge lis pendens. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 170444F.P05