History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roy H. Sotelo III v. Mercedes H. Sotelo
04-17-00019-CV
| Tex. App. | Apr 26, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00019-CV Roy H. SOTELO III, Appellant v.

Mercedes H. SOTELO , Appellee From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-03-29890-CV The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 26, 2017

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due on March 27, 2017. When neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time were filed, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant failed to respond to our order. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM

Case Details

Case Name: Roy H. Sotelo III v. Mercedes H. Sotelo
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 26, 2017
Docket Number: 04-17-00019-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.