History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tyrone Ragland v. S. Lee
687 F. App'x 270
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Ragland, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Ragland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ragland v. Lee , No. 1:15-cv-01663-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Tyrone Ragland v. S. Lee
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 28, 2017
Citation: 687 F. App'x 270
Docket Number: 16-7688
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.