History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alexander Matthews v. Ryan Faulconer
687 F. App'x 242
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Otis Mathews appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration of its order reclassifying Matthews’ complaint as an attorney misconduct disciplinary complaint and denying his misconduct claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Faulconer , No. 1:15-cv-00448-LO-MSN (E.D. Va., filed Nov. 14 & entered Nov. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Alexander Matthews v. Ryan Faulconer
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 27, 2017
Citation: 687 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: 16-7667
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.