History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harold McKinnon v. J. Stewart Butler
686 F. App'x 242
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Green McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold Green McKinnon appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion titled “conspiracy to defraud” and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKinnon v. Butler , No. 5:16-cv-00264-BO (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2016; Nov. 15, 2016). We deny McKinnon’s motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Harold McKinnon v. J. Stewart Butler
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 27, 2017
Citation: 686 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: 16-2398
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.