History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rufus Anderson v. Karen Patterson
686 F. App'x 242
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina; Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Patrick Coler, Assistant City Attorney, Logan McCombs Wells, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint on the basis of qualified immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anderson’s motion for an order of protection or restraining order, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Patterson , No. 6:16-cv-00761-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Rufus Anderson v. Karen Patterson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 27, 2017
Citation: 686 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: 16-2296
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.