History
  • No items yet
midpage
Albemarle Corp. v. United States
2017 CIT 51
| Ct. Intl. Trade | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 Slip Op. 17-51

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ALBEMARLE CORP. ,

Plaintiff,

and

NINGXIA HUAHUI ACTIVATED

CARBON CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Intervenor, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge v. Consol. Court No. 11-00451 UNITED STATES ,

Defendant,

and

CALGON CARBON (TIANJIN) CO.,

LTD., CALGON CARBON CORP. AND

NORIT AMERICAS INC.,

Defendant-Intervenors.

JUDGMENT

Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Oct. 14, 2016), ECF No. 135 (“Remand Redetermination”), which the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) issued in response to the court’s Opinion and Order in Albemarle Corp. v. United States , __ CIT __, Slip Op. 16-84 (Sept. 7, 2016). Plaintiff Albemarle Corporation (“Albemarle”) and plaintiff-intervenor Ningxia Huahui Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (“Huahui”) have commented in favor of the Remand Redetermination. Pl. Albemarle Corp. and Int.-Pl. Ningxia Huahui Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.— Comments on Final Results of Redeterm. pursuant to Ct. Remand (Oct. 27, 2016), ECF No. 137. *2 Consol. Court No. 11-00451 Page 2 No other party submitted comments to the court on the Remand Redetermination. Defendant United States has filed a response in favor of the comment of Albemarle and Huahui. Def.’s Resp. to Comments regarding the Remand Redeterm. (Nov. 28, 2016), ECF No. 138.

The court’s previous Opinion and Order was issued in response to the mandate of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Court of Appeals”) in Albemarle Corp. v. United States , 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). Pursuant to that mandate and the subsequent instructions of this court, Commerce, based on the de minimis and zero margins of the individually examined respondents, assigned Huahui a redetermined weighted average dumping margin of zero. Remand Redetermination 1, 7. The court determines that the Remand Redetermination complies with the mandate issue by the Court of Appeals and this court’s instructions.

Therefore, upon consideration of the Remand Redetermination and all other papers and proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that entries of merchandise that are affected by this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this action.

/s/Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Chief Judge Dated: April 27, 2017

New York, NY

Case Details

Case Name: Albemarle Corp. v. United States
Court Name: United States Court of International Trade
Date Published: Apr 27, 2017
Citation: 2017 CIT 51
Docket Number: Consol. 11-00451
Court Abbreviation: Ct. Intl. Trade
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.