History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.
17-3076
| 6th Cir. | Apr 25, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. _________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court [*] in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

*2 No. 17-3076 Ohio Execution Protocol Litig. Page 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous opinion and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs; this matter is scheduled for oral argument on June 14, 2017.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

[*] Judge Cook recused herself in this case.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 25, 2017
Docket Number: 17-3076
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.