History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek
685 F. App'x 269
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus v. Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 21, 2017
Citation: 685 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: 16-7659
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.