*1 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Dane Boykin, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Boykin has filed a response, but he did not challenge the validity of his appeal waiver. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Boykin’s response. *2 Case: 16-41096 Document: 00513956507 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2017

No. 16-41096

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.