History
  • No items yet
midpage
Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.
16-2323
Fed. Cir.
Apr 12, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant v.

XILINX, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2016-2323 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ N ICOLE E. G LAUSER , DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Har- dy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by A NDREW D I N OVO , J AY D. E LLWANGER .

M ATTHEW J. S ILVEIRA , Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by P ATRICK T HOMAS M ICHAEL ; D AVID B. C OCHRAN , Cleveland, OH.

______________________ *2 T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, L OURIE and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT April 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Apr 12, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2323
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.