History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henrietta Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
16-2274
| 4th Cir. | Apr 7, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henrietta Okoro; Cyriacus Okoro, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas Brooks Riley, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland; David Edwin Solan, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Rockville, Maryland; Alvin Frederick, Lauren Elizabeth Marini, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Henrietta Okoro and Cyriacus Okoro appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:16-cv-00616-PX (D. Md. filed Oct. 6, 2016 & entered Oct. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Henrietta Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 7, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2274
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.