History
  • No items yet
midpage
Simmons v. Charter Communications
16-1405
| 2d Cir. | Apr 7, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 16-1405

Simmons v. Charter Communications

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER R ULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT . C ITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER J ANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY F EDERAL R ULE OF A PPELLATE P ROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT ’ S L OCAL R ULE 32.1.1. W HEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT , A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE F EDERAL A PPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE ( WITH THE NOTATION “ SUMMARY ORDER ”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL .

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, th on the 7 day of April, two thousand seventeen.

PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN,

DENNIS JACOBS,

Circuit Judges, LEWIS A. KAPLAN, [*]

District Judge, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

MICHAEL SIMMONS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

-v.- 16-1405 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. [**]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X *2 FOR APPELLANT: J. AARON LAWSON (with Ryan D.

Andrews and Roger Perlstadt on the brief), Edelson PC, Chicago, IL.

FOR APPELLEE: RAGAN NARESH (with Jeffrey S.

Powell and Kathleen A. Brogan on the brief), Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED .

Michael Simmons appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of defendant Charter Communications, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Underhill’s thorough opinion.

Accordingly we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

FOR THE COURT: CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, CLERK 2

[*] Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

[**] The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption to conform to the above. 1

Case Details

Case Name: Simmons v. Charter Communications
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Apr 7, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1405
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.