*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Chester Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Brown’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for *2 Case: 16-11322 Document: 00513942856 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2017

No. 16-11322

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.