History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gordon Beasley v. Red Rock Financial Services
684 F. App'x 295
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest P. Francis, ERNEST P. FRANCIS, LTD., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Virginia M. Sadler, Padraic K. Keane, JORDAN COYNE LLP, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gordon Beasley appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on some of his claims, denying his motion for summary judgment on one of the Appellees’ defenses, and granting judgment as a matter of law for the Appellees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) after Beasley’s presentation of his remaining claims to the jury. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Gordon Beasley v. Red Rock Financial Services
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 5, 2017
Citation: 684 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: 16-1063
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.