History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Michael Gorbey v.
684 F. App'x 305
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael S. Gorbey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s dockets reveals that the district court entered orders on January 3, 2017, denying the three motions identified in Gorbey’s petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gorbey’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Michael Gorbey v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 5, 2017
Citation: 684 F. App'x 305
Docket Number: 17-1029
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.