History
  • No items yet
midpage
Butler v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
2017 Ark. App. 202
Ark. Ct. App.
2017
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-16-1063 Opinion Delivered: April 5, 2017 CRYSTAL BUTLER APPEAL FROM THE UNION APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 70JV-13-271] V.

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HONORABLE EDWIN KEATON, HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR JUDGE CHILDREN

APPELLEES

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED BART F. VIRDEN, Judge

This is an appeal arising from the order of the Union County Circuit Court terminating appellant Crystal Butler’s parental rights to E.M.1, E.M.2, K.B., J.M., and K.A.B. Butler’s attorney has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel. On appeal, counsel contends that there are no meritorious grounds that could possibly support an appeal.

In compliance with Linker–Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services , 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Rule 6-9(i) (2016) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Butler’s counsel has examined the entire supplemented record for adverse rulings and has noted that, apart from the termination, there were no rulings adverse to Butler. Counsel has adequately discussed why there is no arguable merit to an appeal. Butler was provided a copy of her counsel’s brief and motion, and she exercised her

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202 right to file pro se points on appeal. Neither the Arkansas Department of Human Services nor the attorney ad litem filed a responsive brief.

Having carefully examined the pro se points filed by Butler, the record, and the no- merit brief, we hold that Butler’s counsel has complied with the requirements for no-merit, parental-termination appeals and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, by memorandum opinion, we affirm the termination of Butler’s parental rights to E.M.1, E.M.2, K.B., J.M., and K.A.B. In re Memorandum Opinions , 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Butler.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

G RUBER , C.J., and W HITEAKER , J., agree.

Leah Lanford , Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant. No response.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Butler v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Apr 5, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ark. App. 202
Docket Number: CV-16-1063
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.