History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael Moore v. Michael Morgan
683 F. App'x 218
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Marc Presel, Jolee M. Wortham, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Lamont Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Morgan , No. 5:16-cv-00244-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Michael Moore v. Michael Morgan
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 3, 2017
Citation: 683 F. App'x 218
Docket Number: 16-2170
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.