History
  • No items yet
midpage
SHMUELI, SHMUEL v. WHITESTAR DEVELOPMENT CORP.
CA 15-01584
| N.Y. App. Div. | Mar 31, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 437

CA 15-01584

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

SHMUEL SHMUELI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WHITESTAR DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

OFECK & HEINZE, LLP, HACKENSACK (MARK F. HEINZE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICE OF RALPH C. LORIGO, WEST SENECA (FRANK JACOBSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered June 12, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant for a directed verdict.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s proof pursuant to CPLR 4401 and dismissing plaintiff’s sole cause of action alleging a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We affirm. A plaintiff seeking to prevail on a cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing must prove that he or she sustained actual damages as a natural and probable consequence of the breach ( see RXR WWP Owner LLC v WWP Sponsor, LLC , 132 AD3d 467, 468; see generally Kenford Co. v County of Erie , 73 NY2d 312, 319; Village of Kiryas Joel v County of Orange , 144 AD3d 895, 896). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, he failed at trial to present nonspeculative evidence of his alleged damages ( see Friedman v Miale , 69 AD3d 789, 791, lv denied 16 NY3d 706; see generally Lloyd v Town of Wheatfield , 67 NY2d 809, 810). We thus conclude that the court properly granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict because, upon the evidence presented, there was no rational process by which the trier of fact could find in plaintiff’s favor ( cf. Family Operating Corp. v Young Cab Corp. , 129 AD3d 1016, 1017-1018; see generally Szczerbiak v Pilat , 90 NY2d 553, 556). Entered: March 31, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: SHMUELI, SHMUEL v. WHITESTAR DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 31, 2017
Docket Number: CA 15-01584
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.