History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Steven Twitty
683 F. App'x 194
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Lavour Twitty, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lavour Twitty appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He argues that he was improperly sentenced as a career offender. Twitty’s claim is barred by Beckles v. United States , __ U.S. __, No. 15-8544, 2017 WL 855781 (U.S. Mar. 6, 2017). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Steven Twitty
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 31, 2017
Citation: 683 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: 15-7744
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.