History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Gilberto Ruiz
683 F. App'x 326
| 5th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: [*]

Gilberto Broche Ruiz was convicted following a jury trial of conspiracy to possess and possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 210 months of imprisonment. He appeals his conviction, arguing that he was a denied a fair trial because the Government elicited testimony that he had invoked his Fourth Amendment right to refuse a warrantless search of his cell phone. *2 Case: 16-50480 Document: 00513931644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2017

No. 16-50480

Because Ruiz failed to object to the complained-of testimony, review is for plain error only. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). To establish plain error, he must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. See id. In order to show that an error affected his substantial rights, Ruiz must demonstrate that the error affected the outcome of the proceedings. See id. If he makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but will do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.

Ruiz’s argument is unavailing. Any error is not clear or obvious as our court has only assumed, without deciding, that such testimony may be improper. See United States v. Salinas , 480 F.3d 750, 759 (5th Cir. 2007). In any event, Ruiz fails to show that any error affected the outcome of the proceedings. See United States v. Runyan , 290 F.3d 223, 249-50 (5th Cir. 2002). The record reflects that the prosecutor did not focus on or highlight Ruiz’s refusal to consent to a warrantless search, and the evidence of Ruiz’s guilt was substantial. See id. at 250-51. Thus, Ruiz fails to show that the error, if any, affects his substantial rights. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135.

AFFIRMED.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Gilberto Ruiz
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 29, 2017
Citation: 683 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: 16-50480 Summary Calendar
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.