History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Rodriguez
683 F. App'x 656
| 10th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

_________________________________ This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) letter in which the government informs the court of the Supreme Court decision in Beckles v. United States , ___ S. Ct. ___, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017), and the defendant’s “Statement Re: Beckles ,” in which the defendant states that he “agrees with the Government that Beckles forecloses relief in this case.”

Upon consideration thereof, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.  This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rodriguez
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 28, 2017
Citation: 683 F. App'x 656
Docket Number: 16-1384
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.