History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Mohammad Mohammad-Omar v.
682 F. App'x 219
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, motion to correct clerical errors, and motion for judgment on the pleadings, following the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied these three motions by order dated February 24, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Mohammad-Omar’s pending motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Mohammad Mohammad-Omar v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 27, 2017
Citation: 682 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: 16-2137
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.