History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Nathanael Reynolds v.
682 F. App'x 213
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathanael Lenard Reynolds filed a petition and supplements thereto seeking transfer of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action to “the Supreme Court of the District.” Although he alleges that he cannot receive an impartial hearing in the district court, Reynolds’ conclusory allegations do not establish grounds for disqualification. Accordingly, we deny the petition for transfer. We deny the motion for response and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Nathanael Reynolds v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 23, 2017
Citation: 682 F. App'x 213
Docket Number: 16-2407
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.