Case Information
*1 Before DUBRISKE, HARDING, and C. BROWN, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4. ________________________
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er- ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).
United States v. Karwacki , No. ACM S32383
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED . [1] FOR THE COURT
KURT J. BRUBAKER
Clerk of the Court
[1] As identified by Appellant in his merits brief, the court-martial order (CMO) and report of result of trial incorrectly records that Appellant was found not guilty of both Charge I and its specification and Specification 3 of Charge II. These offenses were withdrawn and dismissed by the Government after acceptance of Appellant’s guilty plea. Appellant acknowledges he suffered no prejudice from these errors. Nonetheless, we direct the promulgation of a new CMO to accurately reflect the findings adjudged in his case. 2