*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ENOVA TECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellant v SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC.,

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, Appellees ______________________ 2016-1287 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00683.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ D ARRYL M ICHAEL W OO , Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by C HAO W ANG ; J ANICE T A , Austin, TX.

D AVID J.F. G ROSS , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minne- apolis, MN, argued for appellees. Also represented by L UCAS J. T OMSICH , J ULIE W AHLSTRAND ; C ALVIN L. L ITSEY , East Palo Alto, CA; R ICHARD M. M ARSH , J R ., Denver, CO.

______________________ T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , T ARANTO , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court