History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gricer Bernard v. Megan Brennan
680 F. App'x 243
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk J. Angel, ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellant. Steven N. Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Gricer Bernard appeals the district court’s order granting Megan J. Brennan’s motion to dismiss Bernard’s amended complaint alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2016). We have considered Bernard’s arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bernard v. Brennan, No. 1:15-cv- 00777-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Gricer Bernard v. Megan Brennan
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 16, 2017
Citation: 680 F. App'x 243
Docket Number: 16-1975
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.