History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dylan Paul Paschall
|
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Dylan Paul Paschall entered an Alford [1] plea to involuntary manslaughter, Idaho Code § 18-4006(2). The district court imposed a unified ten-year sentence, with four years determinate. Paschall appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. *2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Paschall’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

2

[1] See North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970). 1

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dylan Paul Paschall
Court Name: Idaho Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 16, 2017
Court Abbreviation: Idaho Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.