History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Tucker
680 F. App'x 786
| 10th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before PHILLIPS , McKAY , and McHUGH , Circuit Judges.

_________________________________ On February 22, 2017, we issued an Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Certificate of Appealability , in which we granted a certificate of appealability as to “[w]hether, post- Johnson [v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015)], Mr. Tucker’s conviction under Oklahoma law for discharge of a firearm into a dwelling constitutes a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a).” That same day, we issued an order appointing counsel to represent Mr. Tucker, and setting a supplemental briefing schedule.

On March 6, 2017, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Beckles v. United States , __S. Ct.__, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). In light of that opinion, we have  This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

determined that the aforementioned certificate of appealability was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we RESCIND the certificate of appealability issued on February 22, 2017, and DISMISS this appeal.

Entered for the Court Carolyn B. McHugh Circuit Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Tucker
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 15, 2017
Citation: 680 F. App'x 786
Docket Number: 16-6310
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.