History
  • No items yet
midpage
Padilla v. Gum
35,420
| N.M. Ct. App. | Feb 1, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 VANZI, Chief Judge.

*2 {1} Mother appeals from the district court’s custody order, ruling, among other things, that Child should remain with Father in New Mexico and not move to California to live with Mother, Child’s stepfather, and his step- and half-siblings. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, acknowledging that this was a difficult custody decision. We saw no abuse of discretion, however, and proposed to affirm. Mother has responded to our calendar notice with a notice of intent, indicating that she does not intend to file a memorandum in opposition and will not oppose our proposed disposition. For the reasons stated in our notice, we affirm the district court.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. {3}

__________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:

_________________________________

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

_________________________________

STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: Padilla v. Gum
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 1, 2017
Docket Number: 35,420
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.