History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marcus Barroso v. State of Texas
16-51096
5th Cir.
Mar 13, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully reviewed this appeal in light of the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, and the comprehensive district court orders. There is no justification for prolonging this litigation. As this court has ordered before, plaintiffs did not timely appeal the district court’s grant of summary *2 Case: 16-51096 Document: 00513908275 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2017

No. 16-51096

judgment. Their appeal is instead confined to the district court’s August 18, 2016 order. We conclude that the Appellant’s arguments are meritless, as the carefully written orders of the district courts patiently explain. We find no reversible error of law or fact and affirm the district court’s August 18, 2016 order for essentially the same reasons articulated by that order. AFFIRMED .

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: Marcus Barroso v. State of Texas
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 13, 2017
Docket Number: 16-51096
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.