PER CURIAM: ^[*]

Christopher Daniel Curi pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 21 U.S.C. § 846, and was sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment and a four-year term of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the factual basis for his guilty plea was inadequate *2 Case: 16-20416 Document: 00513906502 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2017

No. 16-20416

because the Government failed to prove that he had knowledge of the particular type and quantity of drugs involved in his offense.

As Curi concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that Flores- Figueroa v. United States , 556 U.S. 646 (2009), did not overturn United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez , 319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003), and that the Government is not required to prove knowledge of the drug type and quantity as an element of an § 841 offense. See also United States v. Mata , 513 F. App’x 401, 402 (5th Cir. 2013) (relying on Betancourt to reject as foreclosed a similar challenge to a drug conspiracy conviction). ^[1]

Accordingly, Curi’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

[1] Although an unpublished opinion issued after January 1, 1996, is not controlling precedent, it may be considered as persuasive authority. See Ballard v. Burton , 444 F.3d 391, 401 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4). 2