History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Young
16-1430
| 10th Cir. | Mar 9, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

_________________________________ This matter is before us on Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance . The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States , __S. Ct.__, 2017 WL 855781 (Mar. 6, 2017). Appellant William Lynn Young does not oppose the motion.

Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Young
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 9, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1430
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.