History
  • No items yet
midpage
William Huggins v. Officer Roach
678 F. App'x 153
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Michael Huggins, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

William Michael Huggins appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Huggins’ civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huggins v. Roach, No. 5:15-ct- 03002-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: William Huggins v. Officer Roach
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 1, 2017
Citation: 678 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: 16-7382
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.