History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durham, P. v. Judge
Durham, P. v. Judge ---------- - No. 3 WM 2017
| Pa. | Feb 28, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT PAUL DURHAM, : No. 3 WM 2017

: Petitioner :

: : v. :

: : JUDGE DAVID CASHMAN, :

: Respondent :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED . See Commonwealth v. Reid , 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Case Details

Case Name: Durham, P. v. Judge
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 28, 2017
Docket Number: Durham, P. v. Judge ---------- - No. 3 WM 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.