History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael Sheridan v. Melanie Shekita
16-7535
| 4th Cir. | Feb 28, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Sheridan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Sheridan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sheridan v. Shekita, No. 5:16-ct-03085-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Michael Sheridan v. Melanie Shekita
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 28, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7535
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.