History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young
16-7411
| 4th Cir. | Feb 28, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sulyaman Alislam Wasalaam, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Sulyaman Alislam Wasalaam appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wasalaam v. Young, No. 1:16-cv-01068-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 28, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7411
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.