History
  • No items yet
midpage
B.G. v. Sam Malhotra
16-1837
| 4th Cir. | Feb 27, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert McCaig, LEGAL AID BUREAU, INC., Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Ann M. Sheridan, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

B.G., by her next friend, B.G., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint challenging a state court child custody proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. B.G. v. Malhotra, No. 1:15-cv-02663-RDB (D. Md. June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: B.G. v. Sam Malhotra
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 27, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1837
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.