*1 Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Juliet Arvakhi appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in *2 her Title VII action alleging hostile work environment and retaliation claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles , 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Arvakhi’s hostile work environment claim because Arvakhi failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant’s alleged conduct was severe or pervasive enough to alter the conditions of her employment. See Manatt v. Bank of Am. , 339 F.3d 792, 798 (9th Cir. 2003) (elements of a Title VII hostile work environment claim).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Arvakhi’s retaliation claim because Arvakhi failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether she suffered an adverse action as a result of engaging in protected activity. See Vasquez , 349 F.3d at 646 (elements of a Title VII retaliation claim).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-56923

[*] Craig Clemmensen has been substituted for his predecessor, Julian Castro, as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

[**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[***] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).