History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Lewis Cornell
16-7532
| 4th Cir. | Feb 22, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lewis Thomas Cornell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Lewis Thomas Cornell appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on an amendment to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (a district court has no authority to reconsider its decision on a sentence reduction motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Lewis Cornell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 22, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7532
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.