History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael Wayne Starnes v. State
09-15-00407-CR
Tex.
Feb 15, 2017
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09-15-00407-CR _________________ MICHAEL WAYNE STARNES, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 258th District Court

Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23,882 ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 27, 2015, Michael Wayne Starnes was indicted for theft of property, a Class C misdemeanor which was enhanced to a state jail felony due to previous theft convictions. See Tex. Penal Code § 31.03(e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2016). Trial began in this case on October 5, 2015. The jury found the evidence sufficient to find Starnes guilty of the state jail felony offense of theft of property. *2 After the punishment hearing, the jury rendered a verdict and sentenced Starnes to two years confinement and a fine of $488.88. Starnes timely filed a notice of appeal.

Starnes’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). We granted an extension of time for Starnes to file a pro se brief, but we received no response from him.

We have independently examined the entire appellate record in this matter, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

______________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice *3 Submitted on November 30, 2016

Opinion Delivered February 15, 2017

Do not publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

[1] We cite to the current version of section 31.03(e)(4)(D), because the amendment does not affect the outcome of this appeal.

[2] Starnes may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Case Details

Case Name: Michael Wayne Starnes v. State
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 2017
Docket Number: 09-15-00407-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.