*1 Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sigfriedo Garcia- Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We *2 Case: 16-40742 Document: 00513882572 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 16-40742

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.