History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Michael Green, Jr. v.
677 F. App'x 116
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Lee Green, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Michael Lee Green, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has since granted Green’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Green’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Michael Green, Jr. v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 21, 2017
Citation: 677 F. App'x 116
Docket Number: 17-1063
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.