History
  • No items yet
midpage
J.L. v. India Mitchell
16-2387
| 4th Cir. | Feb 21, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

J.L., Appellant Pro Se. Morris Kletzin, I, Joseph Walter Santini, FRIEDLANDER MISLER, PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Courtney Renee Sydnor, Leesburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

J.L. appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. J.L. v. Mitchell, No. 1:16-cv-00583-GBL- JFA (E.D. Va. Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: J.L. v. India Mitchell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 21, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2387
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.