History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mervin Hinson-Bey v. City of Albermarle Police Dep't
16-2148
| 4th Cir. | Feb 21, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mervin Hinson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Philip Kline, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Mervin Hinson-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hinson-Bey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hinson-Bey has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Mervin Hinson-Bey v. City of Albermarle Police Dep't
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 21, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2148
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.