*1 Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Rosalino Salgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salgado has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well *2 Case: 15-11227 Document: 00513882242 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 15-11227

as Salgado’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.