*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN I:

i’, r

April 17, 1939 Eonorabla David County Atto:mey

El F'sso, Texas

D6ar sir:

eatook and ran The qumation is whether tha benefit OS thirr hti0le plr0ri4145 r0r th6 paptent 0f 0~1~ fifty par wit applieil ,to tha regi6trati0n r6O 3.6 o6rt6l~~fn6t6noO6, 6itUation *hem a &Wr6OXl l-61666 ,-rtaia prOdUOt6 Ot Bi6 OWR 8Ibd al60 PUl-OhO666 JStOdlXOt6 Of Other tBITAOr6, OoW6ycl ~Ob66O6 Q? ~OdUOt6 to his oWlI OUI- both and tr4lli6&Wrt6 them in turn tranaport6 tttea te and after nery pTOO666in$ market.

Ron. David E. LIulcahy, April 17~, 1929, Fage 2 .

'~8 do not believe that the stipulation of the statute providing for traneportatlon to market or other points r0r sale or prooeming permit6 a person, in riret operating a commerolal enterprise suoh as a oannery, to traneport the produots of such oannery to market in a tehlale regietered under Artlole 66756-6a. Nor do m, believe it was intended to permit a person to transport products purohased tram others, with the aid of the oheap- or lloense.

.wO aFo Or the OphiOIl, thar6fOm, thsat the of the Artiolo l 00mao only to a pmmon who truI6- kmfit6 pX't6 hi6 OWD pOdUOt6 to Mtk6t Or other @6t6 for 6610