The language quoted from the above re- ferrod to erotlon is plain end unambiguous. It authorlzeb the Commleelon to exemlna and to;lnepeot reoords of employers and to require reporte'whloh the Commle8ion deems neoesaary. It 1s obvloue- from the context thet the intent of the Legltiiab ture wee to make these reporta~oonfldentIel end ,~' olosad to the public at large. Thn CommItleion 3I expreesly prohibited from publishlngor.reveallng in any menner the private affairs of those busl- nea8 ooncerna end employers which come under Its jurIa6lctlon. It follows from the wording of the act ltaelf that Information contained in the re- ports may not legally be divulged by placing the reports in the hands of pertles who are not expres- ly authorized to Inspect and exemlne them.

we find, therefore, an oxpress prohlbl- tlon In the Act reetrelnlng the Commleelon from dlrroloalng Information contained in the reports it roquire8 of employing units through publication of aeme or laying the records open to public ln- 8pectlon.

It Is true that the eectlon under dis- cussion speolffcelly excludes *public employees In the psrformenco or their pub110 duties* from t.;.nln;M-;Itlon. Thr Texas' World's Fair Commls-

a non-private oorporatlon, In our opinion, &a not fall within this exemption, de- spite its status of patriotic and civic importance. *4 April 14, 1939, IZn,ge 4

Eoh. Grvllle S. Carpenter, tie are constra3ned to hold that the Texas Unen- ploymeat Coapeneatlon ~omr&salon Is not authorized to make repbts of stahhs of employing units avail- able to the Teule %Od.(l'8 Falr Comniisslon, Ino., in order.that the Cocmlesion ml&t obtain froni them reports the IlCUW8 0r employers.

Trueting that the above fully answers your Inquiry, we a-0

Tour8 very truly ATToHsHTO~aFT~ .