History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-615
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1939
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

GERALD C. MANN ATTORNEY GENERAL

Hon. Geo. W. Cox State Health Officer Austin, Texas

Dear Sir:

Opinion No. 0-615 Re: An interpretation of the quarantine laws set forth therein, and definition of the powers of local health officers in enforcement thereof.

We are in receipt of your request for an opinion on the following questions:

"Art. 782 of the Texas Penal Code (1925) provides that anyone violating any provisions of the sanitary code, other than those relating to vital statistics, shall be fined not less than ten, nor more than one thousand dollars.

"Art. 1. See 25 of the Texas Constitution provides "No power of suspending laws in this state shall be exercised except by the Legislature."

"My personal attorney informs me that he has never been a case reported where a person has been convicted of a violation of Art. 782. (1) Is/are such case or cases of record? (2) Would above state const. Art. permit such conviction, or have any bearing whatsoever on case in point-complaint for violation of quarantine regulations?

"Art. 4477, Rule 7 of the Sanitary Code provides: Health authority shall placard all houses where contagious disease exists (in the case in point S.P.) within his jurisdiction.

*2 Hon. Cec. W. Cox, page 2 ply placing a yellow flag or card not less than eight inches wide and twelve inches long with the words 'Contagious Disease'; and the quarantine regulations printed thereon, in a conspicuous place on said house. "(3) Would the placing, as above, a white card with following printed thereon meet requirements? 'Quarantine. Contagious Disease. These premises are hereby placed under quarantine in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Sanitary Code of the State of Texas. Penalty provided by law. By order of County Health Officer.' If this does not meet requirements please give full information. "Rule 5 of Sanitary Code modified quarantine (under this is S.P.) prohibits entrance or exit from the patient's room or house except certain members of the family under rules prescribed by the health authority. "(4) Does that mean the Health Officer may prohibit any member or all members of the family from leaving the house or premises, if in his judgment such permit to leave might jeopardize health of others? "Art. 4440, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, provides for a county quarantine where the county shall furnish medicines, provisions and necessities and medical attention at county expense. "(5) Does this apply to single house quarantine, or does it apply only when, as the law states, the Commissioners' Court may deem such quarantine for the best interest of Public Health, etc.? If it applies to the individual house quarantine, does it mean such to apply in all cases, or only where such help may be asked by family quarantined? If it applies to individual house, as above, is it obligatory on part of Health Officer to report all such quarantines to the County Judge, or other man-

*3 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 3 ber of the Commissioners' Court, and ask that such official see that above conditions are met, family cared for as above? And if such is meaning is the quarantine affected (validity I mean) if county authorities do not go see what is needed? "Please let me have your ruling on the Ar ticles, and (6) your definition as to powers of local health officers in the enforcement of quarantine laws for the protection and health of the people."

Article 782, Vernon's Annotated Criminal Statutes, reads as follows: "Whoever shall violate any provision of the Sanitary Code of this State, other than those relating to vital statistics, shall be fined not less than ten nor more than one thousand dollars."

Article 78la, 1d., provides: "That any person, who for himself or as an offieer, agent, or employee of any other person or of any corporation or partnership, (a) shall inter, cremate, or otherwise finally dispose of the dead body of a human being, or permit the same to be done, or shall remove said body from the primary registration district in which the death occurred or the body was found, without the authority of a burial or removal permit issued by the local registrar of the district in which the death occurred or in which the body was found; or (b) shall refuse or fail to furnish correctly any information in his possession or shall furnish false information affecting any certificate or record, required by this Act; or (c) shall willfully alter, otherwise than is provided by section 18 of this Act [1] , or shall falsify any certificate of birth or death, or any record established by this Act; or (d) being required by this Act to fill out a certificate of birth or death and file the same with the

*4 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 4 local registrar, or deliver it, upon request, to any person charged with the duty of filing the same, shall fail, neglect, or refuse to perform such duty in the manner recuired by this Act; or (e) being a local registrar, deputy registrar, or subregistrar, shall fail, neglect, or refuse to perform his duty as required by this Act and by the instructions, and direction of the state registrar thereunder, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall for the first offense be fined not less than five dollars ( \ 5 . ) n o r m o r e t h a n f i f t y d o l l a r s ( \ 50 .), and for each subsequent offense not less than ten dollars ( \ 10 . ) n o r m o r e t h a n o n e h u n d r e d d o l l a r s ( \ 100 .) , or be imprisoned in the county jail not more than sixty days, or be both fined and imprisoned."

In answer to your first question, we advise that after an extended search through the authorities, especially Vernon's Annotated Criminal and Civil Statutes and the Texas Digest, we have failed to find any reported case involving a conviction under Article 782, supra, for a violation of any provision of the Sanitary Code of Texas, as enacted in Article 4477, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925.

Section 28 of Article 1 of the Texas Constitution provides: "No power of suspending laws in this state shall be exercised except by the Legislature."

Texas Jurisprudence comments upon this section as follows in Vol. 9, p. 500: "Power to suspend the operation of a law may not be exercised except by the Legislature. Accordingly, it is held that the Legislature may not confer authority to suspend a general law of the state upon a municipality or the voters of a political subdivision."

SAN ANTONIO and A.P. RY. CO. vs. LESTER, 89 S.W. 752 ;

*5 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 5

BROWN CRACKER & CANDY CO. vs. CITY OF DALLAS, 137 S.W. 348; BAKER vs. COLAN, 196 S.W. 141; BURTON vs. DUPREZ, 46 S.W. 272; EX EARTE MITCHELL, 177 S.W. 953.

In reply to your second inquiry, it is our opinion that Section 28 of Article 1 of the Constitution of Texas would not have any application to complaints, prosecutions, and convictions for violations of any provision of the Sanitary Code of Texas (Art. 4477, H.C.S., 1925) under Article 782, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes.

Rule 7 of the Sanitary Code enacted by Article 4477, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, reads as follows:

"Health authority shall placard all houses where contagious diseases exist.— Upon notice that smallpox, diphtheria, scarlet fever, or other quarantinedile disease exists within his jurisdiction, it shall be the duty of the local health authority to have the house in which such disease prevails placarded by placing a yellow flag or card not less than eight inches wide and twelve inches long with the words 'contagious disease' and the quarantine regulations printed thereon in a conspicuous place on said house." (Underscoring ours).

With respect to your third question, Rule 7 of the Sanitary Code of Article 4477, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, provides that the house quarantined for a contagious disease be placarded with "a yellow flag or card not less than eight inches wide and twelve inches long with the words 'contagious disease' and the quarantine regulations printed thereon in a conspicuous place on said house." A "white card" would be an express violation of the plain and unambiguous language of the rule which calls for a yellow flag or card. The words "these premises are hereby placed under quarantine in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Sanitary Code of the state of Texas. Penalty provided by law. By order of county health officer" are satisfactory with the exception of the fact that they do not meet the requirement

*6 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 6 of the statute that "the quarantine regulations" be "printed thereon".

This department is not in a position to advise you explicitly as to what the "quarantine regulations" should be. Rule 5 of the Sanitary Code sets forth the "rules to quarantine and disinfection" and these rules, which distinguish between "absolute" and "modified" quarantine, should be followed in drafting "quarantine regulations" to be printed on the quarantine flag or placard.

Rule 5 of Article 4477, supra, reads as follows: "Rules to quarantine and disinfection. The following rules of instruction for the regulation of quarantine, isolation and disinfection in the several contagious diseases, herainbefore mentioned, are to be observed by all boards of health, health officers, physicians, school superintendents and trustees, and others. All health authorities of counties, cities, and towns in this state are hereby directed and authorized to establish local quarantine, hold in detention, maintain isolation and practice disinfection as herainafter provided for, of all such infected persons, vehicles or premises which are infected or are suspected of being infected with any of the above named diseases whenever found. "(a) Absolute quarantine includes, first, absolute prohibition of entrance to or exit from the building or conveyance except by officers or attendants authorized by the health authorities, and the placing of guards if necessary to enforce this prohibition; second, the posting of a warning placard stating 'contagious disease,' in a conspicuous place or places on the outside of the building or conveyance; third, the prohibition of the passing out of any object or material from the quarantined house or conveyance; fourth, provision for conveying the necessaries of life under careful restrictions to those in quarantine."

*7 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 7 "(b) Kodified cuarenting includes prohibi- tion of entrance and exit, and in absolute quarantine except against certain members of the family authorized by the health authorities to pass in and out under certain definite re- strictions; the placing of a placard as before; isolation of patient and attendant; prohibition of the carrying out of any object or material unless the same shall have been thoroughly dis- infected. "(c) Absolute isolation includes, first, the confinement of the patient and attendants to one apartment or suite of apartments, to which none but authorized officers or attend- ants shall have admission; second, screening of room and entire house if necessary with not less than 16 -mesh wire gauze; third, the prohibition of passing out of the sick room of any object or material until the same has been thoroughly disinfected; fourth, protection of the air of the house by hanging a sheet, kept constantly moist with a disinfectant solution, over the doorway of the patient's room or rooms and reach- ing from the top of the door; fifth, if in the opinion of the local health authority the patient can not be treated, with reasonable safety to the public, at home, the removal of the patient and exposures to a contagious disease hospital or post house. "(d) Kodified isolation includes the con- finement of the patient and attendants to one room or suite of rooms, to which none but author- ized officers or attendants shall have admission, but allowing the attendants to pass out of the room after disinfection of person and complete change of clothing; screening as above mention- ed; the prohibition of passing any object or ma- terial out of the sick room until it has been disinfected; protection of the doorway as before. "(e) Special isolation includes, first, prohibition of patient from attending any place

*8 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 8 of public assemblage; second, the providing of separate eating utensils for the patient; third, prohibition of sleeping with others, or using the same towels or napkins. "(f) By complete disinfection is meant disinfection during illness, under direction of attending physician, of patient's body, of all excretions or discharges of patient and of all articles of clothing and utensils used by patient, and after recovery, death or removal, the disinfection of walls, woodwork, furniture, bedding, etc. "(g) By partial disinfection is meant disinf ection of discharges or excretions of patients and their clothing and the room or rooms occupied by the patient during illness." (Under- seoring ours).

As worded, your question four is not exastly elear to our mind, but we advise that subdivision (a) of Rule 6 defines "absolute quarantine" where the members of the family are barred from entrance to or exit from the building or conveyance as well as all other persons by the health authorities, while subdivision (b) of Rule 5 defines "Modified quarantine" distinguishable from "Absolute quarantine" in that certain members of the family designated by the health authorities have the authority to pass in and out of the house under certain definite restrictions within the power of the health authorities.

In answer to your question as we interpret it, you are advised that the health authorities by establishing an "Absolute quarantine" may prohibit all members of the family from entrance to or exit from the building or conveyance, whereas if a "Modified quarantine" is established certain members of the family must be authorized by the health authorities to pass in and out under certain definite restrictions. In every instance the health authorities must declare the quarantine either "Absolute" or "Modified".

Article 4460, Revised Civil Statutes, 1985, provides:

*9 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 9 "Whenever the commissioners court of any county has reason to believe that they are threatened at any point within or without the county limits with the introduction or diesem- ination of a dangerous, contagious or infecti- ous disease that can and should be guarded against by quarantine they may direct their county health officer to declare and maintain said quarantine against any and all such danger- ous diseases; to establish, maintain and supply stations or camps for those held in quarantine; to provide hospitals, tents or past houses for those sick of contagious and infectious disease; to furnish provisions, medicine and all other things absolutely essential for the comfort of the well and the convalescence of the sick. The county physician shall keep an itemised ac- count of all lawful expenses incurred by local quarantine, and his county shall assume and pay them as other claims against the county are paid. Chartered cities and towns are embraced within the purview of this article, and the mere fact of incorporation does not exclude them from the protection against epidemic diseases given by the commissioners court to other parts of their respective counties. The medical officers of chartered cities and towns may perform the duties granted or commanded in their several charters, but must be amenable and obedient to rules pres- scribed by the State Board of Health. This ar- ticle, however, must not be construed as prohib- iting any incorporated town or city from dealar- ing, maintaining and paying for local quarantine." Answering your fifth inquiry, it is our opinion that Article 4460, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, provides that the county shall furnish medical attention, provi- sions, medicine, and all other things absolutely essen- tial for the comfort of the well and the convalescence of the sick whenever the commissioners' court of the coun- ty orders the health authorities to declare and maintain a quarantine, whether it applies to a single house of the entire county. It is entirely within the discretion and judgment of the county commissioners' court as to

*10 Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 10 whether or not the county quarantine in respect to a single residence or many be established, and the expense connected therewith be assumed. The ruarantine is at county expense only when the comnissioners' court acts officially in respect to its establishment.

KING COUNTY vs. BITCSELL, 71 S.W. 610 In this case plaintiff, a rancher and his men, were placed under a strict quarantine by the duly authorized and constituted authority of king County, acting through the County Commissioners' Court of King County, by an order duly entered of record in the minutes of the commissioners' court of king County, quarentining said king County against an infestious disease, in accordance with the terms and provisions of Article 4840, sayle's Annotated Civil Statutes, which is not Article 4460, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925.

Quoting from the opinion of the court:

      • We think a proper interpretation of this statute would require that a county whose commissioners' court has determined that they are threatened with the introduction or dissemination of a dangerous, contagious, or infectious disease, that can and should be guarded against by quarantine, and has directed the county physician to declare and maintain such quarantine, should furnish to those thus detained such provisions, medisines, and other things as are absolutely essential to their comfort and convalescence, and is legally liable therefor. We cannot hold that it is optional with a county to assume the duty of supplying these things. Nor can we assent to the contention of appellant that the county would be relieved of this duty because of the fact that there was no county physician to keep the itemized account of the expenses incident to the quarantine after the resignation of Dr. Hannah. The beneficant purpose of the statute was to supply to those detained in quarantine such things as were absolutely essential to their comfort and convalescence, and the duty of the county physician in the

*11

Hon. Geo. W. Cox, page 11 particular of keeping an itemized account of expenditures is, at most, only ministerial in its nature, and the liability of the county not made to depend upon his compliance. If such were the case, the county could in the most meritorious cases avoid all liability by refusing to appoint such auditing officer. Further, it was the duty of the county judge of appellant county to appoint another physician upon the resignation of Dr. Hannah." ∴ The county made the order directing a quarantine, appointed a ountry phyatician, who established such quarentine, placing guards, etc., about the oamp of appellant and his men, knew of the resignation of the ountry phyatician, and continued thereafter to maintain such quarantine, without providing another, and without in any manner whatever providing for the wants and nedessities of those thus affected by the order, yand must, under the circumstances alleged, be held to have consented to the appellant's supplying such things as it was legally liable for, but which it had made no arrangements to supply."

As for your last question, we deem it inadvisable to answer it at this time because of its general nature, but wish to advise that if you have any further specific questions coneerning the powers of local health officers in the onforeament of quarantine laws we shall be glad to render our opinion in respect to same.

Trusting that we have fully answered the first five questions propounded in your letter of request, we are

Yours very truly

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1939
Docket Number: O-615
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.