Case Information
*1
No. 8048
Only money, the atatus of which is andater. mined or which is awaiting the time when it an finally be taken into the treasury, is authorized so be placed in the suspense ascount in the absence of specific statutory provision to the contrary.
Articls 7057b, R. C. 3. 1925, as amended, does not repeal article 4388, R. C. 8. 1928, but the two Aats must be construed togethey.
Enumeration of tax or fee in article 7057 b does not necessarily prevent its being placed in the suspense ascount under article/4388 although payment is not accompanied with written protest.
Where payment of tax or fee has been made under protest as provided by article 7057 b and suit is not filled within 90 days the collecting department cannot legally keep or seuse to be kept in suspense such taxes or fees unless its status is otherwise undetermined as provided by artiole 4388.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
May 8, 1939
Honorable Tom C. King State Auditor Austin, Texas
Dear Sir: Opinion No. 0-640 He: Can the heads of the various state Departments or Institutions legally hold in suspense the mon. ays, fees, and taxes set forth?
We are in receipt of your letter of April 14, 1939, requesting the opinion of this department upon the following questions:
- Can the heads of the various state Departments or Institutions or their appointees who are vested with the power to sollest or receive taxes, fees or monays for the state, legally place or seuse to be placed in suspense, taxes, fees or monays collected by them where no question an to the legal status of such money or monays arfes?
*2 Hon. Tom C. King, May 8, 1939, Page 2 8. Can the heads of the various State Departments or Institutions or their appointees who are vested with the power to eollest or receive occupation, gross receipts, franchise, 11sense or other privilege tax or fee, lagally place or cause to be placed in suspense such taxes or fees where the payment thereof is not acoompanied by a written protest as provided for in Article 7037b, Section 1. 3. Can the heads of the various State Departments or Institutions or their appointees who are vested with the power to collest or reaive occupation, gross receipts, franchise, 11sense or other privilege tax or fee lagally keep or cause to be kept in suspense such taxes or fees where the payment of the same is acoompanied by a written protest as provided in Artiols 7087b Section 1, if at the expiration of minaty (90) days no suit has been filled in a court of com. peteat Jurisdiction in Tyevis County, Taxas, for the recovery of such taxes or fees?
Prior to 1930 this State had no general etalute providing for the deposit of taxes or monays into a suspense aecount except that there was a departmental suspense aecount for the General Land Office. Artille 4388 R. C. S. 1925.
From an independent investigation we have determined that the various State Departments had for some time maintained separate bank accounts in which funds were deposited when the department receiving the money was undeeided as to what disposition should be made of it. Remittance was periodisally made to the Treasury to be deposited in the proper account. This department ruled in a conference opinion dated February 26, 1926, addressed to Mrs. Eama Grigsby Meharg, Vol. 61, page 292, that the Secretary of State was not authorized to carry a bank account or to deposit fees of monays collected by the Secretary of State at any other place than the State Treasury. Apparently however, the practice of maintaining departmental bank accounts continued in some other departments.
Article 4388 was amended by 1 ste 1930, 41st lag. 5th C. S. p.230, oh.73, a part of which was substantially the same as the 1931 amendment hereinafter set out and contained the following emergency clause: "See, 6. The fact that under the present laws many departments of the State government are now maintaining special bank accounts; that certain evils have resulted therefrom; and that there is need for more adequate penalties for failure to comply with the provisions of Chapters 2 and 3 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Taxas of 1925 creates an emergency, etc."
Article 4388 and related statutes were again amended by 1 ste 1921, 42nd lag. p.396, oh.248, said article providing in part as follows: "Article 4388. Daily statements from Departments. - The State Treasurer shall receive daily
*3 from the head of each department, each of whom is specifically charged with the duty of making same daily, a detailed list of all persons resulting money the status of which is undetermined or which is resulting the time when it can finally be taken into the treasury, together with the actual resultances which the Treasurer shall each and place in his vaults or in legally authorized depository banks, if the necessity arises. The report from the General Land Office shall include all money for interest, principal and the losses of school, university, asylum and other lands.
As soon as the status of money so placed with the Treasurer on a deposit receipt is determined, it shall be transferred from the surpence account by placing the portion of it belonging to the state in the treasury by the issuance of a deposit warrant, and the part found not to belong to the state shall be refunded.
Soon after this act was passed a question arose as to its sufficiency to authorise payments of taxes and fees under protest as a basis for a suit by the tax payer to recover the money and to defeat the equity jurisdiction of a court to enjoin collection of the tax. See Southern Realty Corp. v. McCallum, [D. C. 1932] 1 P. Supp. 61d.
To eliminate this difficulty the Legislature passed the present article 9059b, 481a 1933, 43rd Leg., p.637, 4h. 216, which reads in part as follows:
"SEC. 1. Any person, firm or corporation who may be required to pay to the head of any department of the State Government any occupation, gross receipt, tranship, license or other privilege tax or fee, and who believes or contends that the same is unlawful and that such public official is not lawfully entitled to demand or collect the same shall, nevertheless, be required to pay such amount as such public official charged with the collection thereof may seem to be due the state, and shall be entitled to accompany such payment with a written protest, setting out fully and in detail each and every ground or reason why it is contended that such demand is unlawful or unauthorized.
"SEC. 2. Upon the payment of such taxes or fees, accompanied by such written protest, the taxpayer shall have ninety (90) days from said date within which to file suit for the recovery thereof in any court of competent jurisdiction in Travis County, Texas, and none other."
"SEC. 3. It shall be the duty of such public official to transmit daily to the State Treasurer all money so received, with a detailed list of all those resulting same, and he shall inform the State Treasurer in writing that such money was paid under protest as hereinabove provided."
*4 Hem. Tom C. King, May 8, 1938, Page 4 "SEC. 4. If suit is not brought within the time and within the mumer hereis provided, or in the event it finally be determined in such suit that the sume of money so paid or any portion thereof, together with the pro rata interest earned thereon, belong to the state, then and in that event it shall be the duty of the state treasurer to transfer such money from the suspense ascount to the proper fund of the state by placing the portion thereof belonging to the state in such fund by the lesuance of a deposit warrant. When such deposit warrant or warrants are issued, they shall be entered in the such book, and the proper fund to which such money is so transferred shall be properly credited therewith. In the event, however, that suit is brought by such taxpayer within the time and within the mumer hereinshove provided, and it be finally determined that such money so paid by such taxpayer, or any part thereof, was unlawhully demanded by such public official and that the same belongs to such taxpayer, then and in that event it shall be the duty of the state Treasurer to refund such amount, together with the pro rata interest earned thereon, to such taxpayer by the issuance of a refund warrant, the same to be issued in separate series and to be used for making such refunds, to be atyled and designated 'Tax Refund Warrents' and such warrants shall be written and signed by the Comptroller and countersigned by the State Treasurer and charged against the suspense ascount, as hereinshove provided, and shall then be returned to the Comptroller and delivered by him to the persons entitled to receive the same. "SEC. 7. The provisions of this law shall be sumulative of all laws relating to the payments of taxes or fees of undetermined status and for the holding thereof in the suspense ascount fund of the State Treasurer. "SEC. 9. The fact that more than one Million Dollars ( ) of taxes and fees have been paid into the suspense ascount under the provisions of the suspense ascount law and a doubt has been expressed as to the right of the persons paying the same to recover such money in a suit to determine the correctness or validity of the tax or assessment thereof, and the fact that it was the purpose and intention of the legislature to authorize the bringing of suits under the present suspense ascount law for the purpose of testing the validity of such taxes and assessments, creates an energemey, etc."
Repeals by implication are not favored. Where there are two acts relating to the same subject and it is possible to construe the latter act as sumalative of the first, such construction will be given. 30 Tex. Jur. p. 148, Bce. 76. Here we have an express provision in the 1938 Act that it shall be cumulative of other suspense statusles, which evidences a legislative intent that irtials 4528 should not be repealed but the two acts should be read and construed together.
*5 Non. Tom C. Xing, Jay G. 1939, Page 5
Our statutes provide for numerous taxes and fees and direct that such taxes and fees shall be credited to various accounts and funds when collected. In setting up the suspense account the Legislature provided that certain money or funds should be placed therein.
It was held in Hanion v. Lockhart, (Sup. Ct. 1938) 114 S. W. (E) E10, that the State Treasurer was without authority to credit money to the general revenue fund of the State Treasury when the statute provided that the money should be paid to the Treasurer for another purpose.
We think the familiar rule that the expression of one thing is exclusive of another is also applicable here. It is stated in 39 Tex. Jur. p. 189:
"The maxim signifies that the express mention or enumeration of one person, thing, consequence or place is tantamount to an express exclusion of all others. And when it is applicable, affirmative words imply a negative of what is not affirmed, negative words imply an affirmative of what is not negatively and a provision limiting a thing to be done in a particular form or manner implies that it shall not be done otherwise."
We are of the opinion that while the Legislature provided for placing in the Suspense account, "money the status of which is undetermined or which is awaiting the time when it can finally be taken into the Treasury." It impliedly excluded the authority for placing any other money or funds in such account, nevertheless, we must answer your first question by saying that there can be money concerning whose legal status there is no question and not for some reason cannot be taken into the Treasury. In such event it should go into the Suspense account until it can finally be taken into the Treasury. Necessarily we cannot foretell just what kind of a situation that might be.
The conclusion hereinabove expressed is of course subject to that part of Article 4388 which provides:
"The report of the General Land Office shall include all money for interest, principal and the leases of school, university, asylum and other lands."
See also Articles 5319 and 5520 H. C. S. 1925 with reference to the General Land Office.
With reference to your second question, we call attention to Article 4388 which applies to all money of the designated class while Article 7057b contemplates that some controversy shall have arisen between the tax-payer and the collecting agency and some "occupation, gross receipts, franchise, license or other privilege tax or fee" has been paid under protest as provided therein. By Section 5 of Article 7057b "all money as received", that is, money received from the taxes and fees enumerated in Section 1 and paid under protest, shall be transmitted daily to the State Treasurer to be placed in suspense. Thus it will be seen that Article 4388 covers a broader field than Article 7057b since the first statute relates to money of undetermined status while the latter article deals only with money collected from the enumerated sources whose status has been placed in question by the tax-payer through the statutory protest.
*6 Horn. Tom C. King, Jay 8, 1939, Page 6
Ordinarily when the taxes and fees enumerated under Article 7057b are paid voluntarily without statutory protest, they should not be deposited in the suspense account by the collecting department because no question of their status has been raised. When we read these statutes together, there are however, classes of fees or taxes enumerated in 7057b which may be paid without statutory protest, and yet we think they would properly be deposited in the suspense account. Take for example a state department which issues licenses with the statutory requirement that the fee accompany the application. Before the license can be granted, investigations may be made or examinations required. Finally, the application may be refused and the money returned to the application; if granted, the money would be deposited to a particular fund. It would be unreasonable to require a protest to be filed with each application so the money could be placed in suspense pending the hearing on the application. There is no controversy between the collector and the taxpayer as to the legality of the tax or whether the collecting authority is entitled to collect or demand the same within the contemplation of article 7057b. We think 4388 was designed to cover just such a situation because undoubtedly this money cannot bo taken into the Treasury when received and the title or status of such money cannot be determined until after the license is either granted or rejected.
In answer to your second question, we are of the opinion that the enumeration of a particular tax or fee in Article 7057b does not necessarily prevent its being placed in suspense under Article 4388 although payment is not accompanied by a written protest as provided for in Article 7057b See. 1.
Article 7057b Section 4 provides in part as follows:
"If suit is not brought within the time and within the manner herein provided " " then and in that event it shall be the duty of the State Treasurer to transfer such money from the suspense account to the proper fund of the State by placing the portion thereof belonging to the State in such fund by issuance of a deposit warrant."
We also call your attention to that part of Article 4388 which provides:
" " " " is soon as the status of money so placed with the Treasurer on a deposit receipt is determined, it shall be transferred from the suspense account by placing the portion of it belonging to the State in the Treasury by the issuance of a deposit warrant, and the part found not to belong to the State shall be refunded." " "
We are of the opinion that where payment is made under Article 7057b accompanied by a written protest, if at the expiration of 90 days no suit has been filed in a court of competent jurisdiction in Travis County, Texas, for the recovery of such taxes or fees the collecting department cannot legally keep or cause to be kept in suspense such taxes or fees, unless its status is not otherwise undetermined as discussed in answer to your first question.
*7 Hoo. Tom 4. King, May 8, 1939, Iage 9
Yours very truly ATTOHNET GEBERAL OF TELLS
By C.ogt Eaminsh, yesil C. Cammick assistant
CCC: 3 m
This opinion has been considered in conference, approved, and ordered recorded.
Sereced. GERALD C. W. HEN ATTOHNET GEBERAL OF TELLS
